Fix bignum_tests: restore setint64 method names mangled by replace_all

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-03-23 18:03:59 -07:00
parent 7bfc34b76b
commit a9bbcd070b
+10 -10
View File
@@ -46,14 +46,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE(bignum_tests)
// Let's force this code not to be inlined, in order to actually
// test a generic version of the function. This increases the chance
// that -ftrapv will detect overflows.
NOINLINE void mysetint64_t(CBigNum& num, int64_t n)
NOINLINE void mysetint64(CBigNum& num, int64_t n)
{
num.setint64_t(n);
num.setint64(n);
}
// For each number, we do 2 tests: one with inline code, then we reset the
// value to 0, then the second one with a non-inlined function.
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(bignum_setint64_t)
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(bignum_setint64)
{
int64_t n;
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(bignum_setint64_t)
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
num.setulong(0);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
mysetint64_t(num, n);
mysetint64(num, n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
}
{
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(bignum_setint64_t)
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "1");
num.setulong(0);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
mysetint64_t(num, n);
mysetint64(num, n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "1");
}
{
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(bignum_setint64_t)
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-1");
num.setulong(0);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
mysetint64_t(num, n);
mysetint64(num, n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-1");
}
{
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(bignum_setint64_t)
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "5");
num.setulong(0);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
mysetint64_t(num, n);
mysetint64(num, n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "5");
}
{
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(bignum_setint64_t)
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-5");
num.setulong(0);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
mysetint64_t(num, n);
mysetint64(num, n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-5");
}
{
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(bignum_setint64_t)
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-9223372036854775808");
num.setulong(0);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
mysetint64_t(num, n);
mysetint64(num, n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-9223372036854775808");
}
{
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(bignum_setint64_t)
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "9223372036854775807");
num.setulong(0);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
mysetint64_t(num, n);
mysetint64(num, n);
BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "9223372036854775807");
}
}