sami7777/cac3
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge #11389: Support having SegWit always active in regtest (sipa, ajtowns, jnewbery)

Browse Source 
d61845818 Have SegWit active by default (Pieter Wuille)
4bd89210a Unit tests for always-active versionbits. (Anthony Towns)
d07ee77ab Always-active versionbits support (Pieter Wuille)
18e071841 [consensus] Pin P2SH activation to block 173805 on mainnet (John Newbery)
526023aa7 Improve handling of BIP9Deployment limits (Anthony Towns)

Pull request description:

  Most tests shouldn't have to deal with the now-historical SegWit activation transition (and other deployments, but SegWit is certainly the hardest one to accomodate).

  This PR makes a versionbits starttime of -1 equal to "always active", and enables it by default for SegWit on regtest. Individual tests can override this by using the existing `-vbparams` option.

  A few unit tests and functional tests are adapted to indeed override vbparams, as they specifically test the transition.

  This is in preparation for wallet SegWit support, but I thought having earlier eyes on it would be useful.

Tree-SHA512: 3f07a7b41cf46476e6c7a5c43244e68c9f41d223482cedaa4c02a3a7b7cd0e90cbd06b84a1f3704620559636a2268f5767d4c52d09c1b354945737046f618fe5
This commit is contained in:
MarcoFalke
2017-11-07 17:03:00 -05:00
parent 6f01dcf638 d618458184
commit dd561667cb
16 changed files with 96 additions and 40 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
src/test/miner_tests.cpp
+18 -17
View File
@@ -335,23 +335,6 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity)
BOOST_CHECK_THROW(AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey), std::runtime_error);
mempool.clear();
// invalid (pre-p2sh) txn in mempool, template creation fails
tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[0]->GetHash();
tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 0;
tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << OP_1;
tx.vout[0].nValue = BLOCKSUBSIDY-LOWFEE;
script = CScript() << OP_0;
tx.vout[0].scriptPubKey = GetScriptForDestination(CScriptID(script));
hash = tx.GetHash();
mempool.addUnchecked(hash, entry.Fee(LOWFEE).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(true).FromTx(tx));
tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = hash;
tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << std::vector<unsigned char>(script.begin(), script.end());
tx.vout[0].nValue -= LOWFEE;
hash = tx.GetHash();
mempool.addUnchecked(hash, entry.Fee(LOWFEE).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(false).FromTx(tx));
BOOST_CHECK_THROW(AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey), std::runtime_error);
mempool.clear();
// double spend txn pair in mempool, template creation fails
tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[0]->GetHash();
tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << OP_1;
@@ -391,6 +374,24 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity)
chainActive.SetTip(next);
}
BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate = AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey));
// invalid p2sh txn in mempool, template creation fails
tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[0]->GetHash();
tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 0;
tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << OP_1;
tx.vout[0].nValue = BLOCKSUBSIDY-LOWFEE;
script = CScript() << OP_0;
tx.vout[0].scriptPubKey = GetScriptForDestination(CScriptID(script));
hash = tx.GetHash();
mempool.addUnchecked(hash, entry.Fee(LOWFEE).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(true).FromTx(tx));
tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = hash;
tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << std::vector<unsigned char>(script.begin(), script.end());
tx.vout[0].nValue -= LOWFEE;
hash = tx.GetHash();
mempool.addUnchecked(hash, entry.Fee(LOWFEE).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(false).FromTx(tx));
BOOST_CHECK_THROW(AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey), std::runtime_error);
mempool.clear();
// Delete the dummy blocks again.
while (chainActive.Tip()->nHeight > nHeight) {
CBlockIndex* del = chainActive.Tip();
src/test/test_bitcoin.cpp
+3
View File
@@ -118,6 +118,9 @@ TestingSetup::~TestingSetup()
TestChain100Setup::TestChain100Setup() : TestingSetup(CBaseChainParams::REGTEST)
{
// CreateAndProcessBlock() does not support building SegWit blocks, so don't activate in these tests.
// TODO: fix the code to support SegWit blocks.
UpdateVersionBitsParameters(Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_SEGWIT, 0, Consensus::BIP9Deployment::NO_TIMEOUT);
// Generate a 100-block chain:
coinbaseKey.MakeNewKey(true);
CScript scriptPubKey = CScript() << ToByteVector(coinbaseKey.GetPubKey()) << OP_CHECKSIG;
src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp
+15
View File
@@ -32,6 +32,12 @@ public:
int GetStateSinceHeightFor(const CBlockIndex* pindexPrev) const { return AbstractThresholdConditionChecker::GetStateSinceHeightFor(pindexPrev, paramsDummy, cache); }
};
class TestAlwaysActiveConditionChecker : public TestConditionChecker
{
public:
int64_t BeginTime(const Consensus::Params& params) const override { return Consensus::BIP9Deployment::ALWAYS_ACTIVE; }
};
#define CHECKERS 6
class VersionBitsTester
@@ -43,6 +49,8 @@ class VersionBitsTester
// The first one performs all checks, the second only 50%, the third only 25%, etc...
// This is to test whether lack of cached information leads to the same results.
TestConditionChecker checker[CHECKERS];
// Another 6 that assume always active activation
TestAlwaysActiveConditionChecker checker_always[CHECKERS];
// Test counter (to identify failures)
int num;
@@ -56,6 +64,7 @@ public:
}
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) {
checker[i] = TestConditionChecker();
checker_always[i] = TestAlwaysActiveConditionChecker();
}
vpblock.clear();
return *this;
@@ -82,6 +91,7 @@ public:
for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) {
if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) {
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateSinceHeightFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == height, strprintf("Test %i for StateSinceHeight", num));
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateSinceHeightFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == 0, strprintf("Test %i for StateSinceHeight (always active)", num));
}
}
num++;
@@ -92,6 +102,7 @@ public:
for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) {
if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) {
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_DEFINED, strprintf("Test %i for DEFINED", num));
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE (always active)", num));
}
}
num++;
@@ -102,6 +113,7 @@ public:
for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) {
if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) {
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_STARTED, strprintf("Test %i for STARTED", num));
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE (always active)", num));
}
}
num++;
@@ -112,6 +124,7 @@ public:
for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) {
if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) {
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_LOCKED_IN, strprintf("Test %i for LOCKED_IN", num));
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE (always active)", num));
}
}
num++;
@@ -122,6 +135,7 @@ public:
for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) {
if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) {
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE", num));
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE (always active)", num));
}
}
num++;
@@ -132,6 +146,7 @@ public:
for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) {
if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) {
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_FAILED, strprintf("Test %i for FAILED", num));
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE (always active)", num));
}
}
num++;